↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012663.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank-Jan H Drost, Daniël F Osses, Daan Nieboer, Ewout W Steyerberg, Chris H Bangma, Monique J Roobol, Ivo G Schoots

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 41%
Engineering 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 25 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#544,487
of 17,436,984 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,315
of 11,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,168
of 276,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,436,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.