↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
284 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007954
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Arroll, C Raina Elley, Tana Fishman, Felicity A Goodyear-Smith, Tim Kenealy, Grant Blashki, Ngaire Kerse, Stephen MacGillivray

Abstract

Concern has been expressed about the relevance of secondary care studies to primary care patients specifically about the effectiveness of antidepressant medication. There is a need to review the evidence of only those studies that have been conducted comparing antidepressant efficacy with placebo in primary care-based samples.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 393 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 69 17%
Student > Master 52 13%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Other 29 7%
Other 92 23%
Unknown 86 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 34%
Psychology 48 12%
Neuroscience 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 4%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 100 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 187. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#184,143
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#323
of 12,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#391
of 111,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.