↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter‐term hormonal methods of contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
Title
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter‐term hormonal methods of contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004317.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha Mack, Tineke J Crawford, Jeanne‐Marie Guise, Mario Chen, Thomas W Grey, Paul J Feldblum, Laurie L Stockton, Maria F Gallo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 292 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 13%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 117 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Unspecified 13 4%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 130 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,303,375
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,807
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,728
of 364,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.