↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001453.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audra Stewart, Luc P Brion

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 19 12%
Other 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 47 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 53 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,689,031
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,224
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,949
of 136,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.