The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001453.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Audra Stewart, Luc P Brion |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 163 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 13% |
Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
Other | 34 | 21% |
Unknown | 51 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 57 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,180,933
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,617
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,049
of 137,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.