| Title |
Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011337.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megumi Haruna, Masayo Matsuzaki, Erika Ota, Mie Shiraishi, Nobutsugu Hanada, Rintaro Mori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 35% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 655 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 653 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 7% |
| Researcher | 41 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 109 | 17% |
| Unknown | 292 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 107 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 16% |
| Psychology | 27 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 80 | 12% |
| Unknown | 312 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,531,075
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,290
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,783
of 363,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.