↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
Title
Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011337.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megumi Haruna, Masayo Matsuzaki, Erika Ota, Mie Shiraishi, Nobutsugu Hanada, Rintaro Mori

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 358 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 51 14%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 102 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 19%
Psychology 22 6%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Arts and Humanities 10 3%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 117 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#918,106
of 17,985,184 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,354
of 11,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,858
of 277,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,985,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.