↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
496 Mendeley
Title
Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011337.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megumi Haruna, Masayo Matsuzaki, Erika Ota, Mie Shiraishi, Nobutsugu Hanada, Rintaro Mori

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 494 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 68 14%
Student > Master 62 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 8%
Researcher 38 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 5%
Other 88 18%
Unknown 175 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 18%
Psychology 27 5%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Sports and Recreations 9 2%
Other 61 12%
Unknown 193 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,116,880
of 21,436,792 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,628
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,377
of 288,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,436,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.