↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical methods for preventing deep vein thrombosis in stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Physical methods for preventing deep vein thrombosis in stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001922.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcello Naccarato, Fabio Chiodo Grandi, Martin Dennis, Peter AG Sandercock

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Other 11 12%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,604,920
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,107
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,520
of 270,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.