↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007424.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Brazzelli, Peter AG Sandercock, Francesca M Chappell, Maria Grazia Celani, Enrico Righetti, Nicholas Arestis, Joanna M Wardlaw, Jonathan J Deeks

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 266 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Master 37 13%
Researcher 29 10%
Other 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 64 23%
Unknown 60 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 75 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,780,498
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,245
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,785
of 109,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.