↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007424.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Brazzelli, Peter AG Sandercock, Francesca M Chappell, Maria Grazia Celani, Enrico Righetti, Nicholas Arestis, Joanna M Wardlaw, Jonathan J Deeks

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 262 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Master 37 13%
Researcher 29 11%
Other 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 63 23%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 72 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,502,676
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,818
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,893
of 106,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.