↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia correction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia correction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007112.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Settas, Clare Settas, Evangelos Minos, Ian YL Yeung

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 31 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 42 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,633,817
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,742
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,206
of 181,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.