↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Imaging modalities for the non‐invasive diagnosis of endometriosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
430 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
765 Mendeley
Title
Imaging modalities for the non‐invasive diagnosis of endometriosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009591.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki Nisenblat, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Cindy Farquhar, Neil Johnson, M Louise Hull

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 765 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 761 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 13%
Student > Bachelor 93 12%
Other 64 8%
Researcher 63 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 7%
Other 155 20%
Unknown 240 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 299 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 3%
Psychology 22 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 2%
Other 90 12%
Unknown 265 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#814,291
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,539
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,833
of 313,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.