↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Immobilisation versus early ankle movement for treating acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Immobilisation versus early ankle movement for treating acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012101
Authors

David J Keene, Mark A Williams, Anand H Segar, Christopher Byrne, Sarah E Lamb

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 29%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,790,761
of 26,614,447 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,032
of 13,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,574
of 314,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,614,447 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.