The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Treatment for IgG and IgA paraproteinaemic neuropathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005376.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abraham CJ Stork, Michael PT Lunn, Eduardo Nobile‐Orazio, Nicolette C Notermans |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,954,410
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,169
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,457
of 279,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.