The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Different dosage schedules for reducing cardiotoxicity in people with cancer receiving anthracycline chemotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005008.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elvira C van Dalen, Helena JH van der Pal, Leontien CM Kremer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 78 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,435,921
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,708
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,951
of 314,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#182
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.