↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
19 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
247 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Crowther, Max Marshall, Gary R Bond, Peter Huxley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 186 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 19%
Psychology 30 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 15%
Social Sciences 24 13%
Unspecified 5 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 50 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#943,054
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,063
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#591
of 40,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.