↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003814.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elliot Abt, Alan B Carr, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Management of individuals presenting with partial loss of teeth is a common task for dentists. Outcomes important to the management of missing teeth in the partially absent dentition should be systematically summarized. This review recognizes both the challenges associated with such a summarization and the critical nature of the information for patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 181 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 24%
Student > Postgraduate 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 65%
Psychology 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Materials Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 36 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,481,661
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,762
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,812
of 258,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.