| Title |
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006697.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Esposito, Hassan Maghaireh, Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Ioannis Ziounas, Helen V Worthington |
| Abstract |
Dental implants are usually placed by elevating a soft tissue flap, but in some instances, they can also be placed flapless reducing patient discomfort. Several flap designs and suturing techniques have been proposed. Soft tissues are often manipulated and augmented for aesthetic reasons. It is often recommended that implants are surrounded by a sufficient width of attached/keratinised mucosa to improve their long-term prognosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 350 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 109 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 182 | 52% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 120 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,221,763
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,660
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,585
of 258,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.