↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006697.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Hassan Maghaireh, Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Ioannis Ziounas, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Dental implants are usually placed by elevating a soft tissue flap, but in some instances, they can also be placed flapless reducing patient discomfort. Several flap designs and suturing techniques have been proposed. Soft tissues are often manipulated and augmented for aesthetic reasons. It is often recommended that implants are surrounded by a sufficient width of attached/keratinised mucosa to improve their long-term prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 340 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 18%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Postgraduate 31 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 99 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 53%
Psychology 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Materials Science 5 1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 110 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,194,861
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,630
of 12,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,315
of 258,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.