↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) for home-based nutritional rehabilitation of severe acute malnutrition in children from six months to five years of age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
634 Mendeley
Title
Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) for home-based nutritional rehabilitation of severe acute malnutrition in children from six months to five years of age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009000.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anel Schoonees, Martani J Lombard, Alfred Musekiwa, Etienne Nel, Jimmy Volmink

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 634 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 634 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 13%
Researcher 67 11%
Student > Bachelor 65 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 8%
Other 35 6%
Other 110 17%
Unknown 225 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 4%
Social Sciences 25 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 3%
Other 99 16%
Unknown 260 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,785,381
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,889
of 13,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,309
of 358,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.