↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
67 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001287.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillippa Poole, Kavin Sathananthan, Rebecca Fortescue

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 170 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 40 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#551,630
of 17,504,055 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,331
of 11,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,917
of 274,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,504,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.