↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
70 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008388.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Christine Hazelton, Fiona J Rowe, Sven Jonuscheit, Ashleigh Kernohan, Jayne Angilley, Clair A Henderson, Peter Langhorne, Pauline Campbell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 402 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 50 12%
Researcher 34 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 54 13%
Unknown 159 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 12%
Psychology 28 7%
Neuroscience 18 4%
Sports and Recreations 9 2%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 180 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#778,380
of 24,880,704 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,525
of 12,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,372
of 356,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,880,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.