↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
75 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008388.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Christine Hazelton, Fiona J Rowe, Sven Jonuscheit, Ashleigh Kernohan, Jayne Angilley, Clair A Henderson, Peter Langhorne, Pauline Campbell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 354 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 131 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 13%
Psychology 27 8%
Neuroscience 18 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 148 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#680,831
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,356
of 12,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,026
of 351,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.