↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008388.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Christine Hazelton, Fiona J Rowe, Sven Jonuscheit, Ashleigh Kernohan, Jayne Angilley, Clair A Henderson, Peter Langhorne, Pauline Campbell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 64 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Psychology 17 8%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 77 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2021.
All research outputs
#439,333
of 17,373,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#990
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,956
of 274,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,373,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.