↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006117.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Cipriani, Teresa La Ferla, Toshi A Furukawa, Alessandra Signoretti, Atsuo Nakagawa, Rachel Churchill, Hugh McGuire, Corrado Barbui

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence clinical practice guideline on the treatment of depressive disorder recommended that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors should be the first-line option when drug therapy is indicated for a depressive episode. Preliminary evidence suggested that sertraline might be slightly superior in terms of effectiveness.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 235 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 20%
Student > Master 44 18%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 44 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 35%
Psychology 24 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 56 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,352,999
of 17,371,891 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,995
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,720
of 130,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,371,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.