| Title |
Holding chambers versus nebulisers for inhaled steroids in chronic asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001491.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J Cates, Janine C Bestall, Nick P Adams |
| Abstract |
Inhaled corticosteroids are available in the form of a suspension for nebulisation, although the role of this mode of therapy in the treatment of chronic asthma is still unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,911,493
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,545
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,530
of 154,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.