↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006536.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clifford DM, Fisher SA, Brunskill SJ, Doree C, Mathur A, Watt S, Martin-Rendon E, Clifford, David M, Fisher, Sheila A, Brunskill, Susan J, Doree, Carolyn, Mathur, Anthony, Watt, Suzanne, Martin-Rendon, Enca

Abstract

Stem cell therapy offers a promising approach to the regeneration of damaged vascular and cardiac tissue after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This has resulted in multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) worldwide.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 7 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Engineering 9 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 11 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,171,907
of 17,970,704 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,977
of 11,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,343
of 132,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,970,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.