↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006536.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clifford DM, Fisher SA, Brunskill SJ, Doree C, Mathur A, Watt S, Martin-Rendon E, Clifford, David M, Fisher, Sheila A, Brunskill, Susan J, Doree, Carolyn, Mathur, Anthony, Watt, Suzanne, Martin-Rendon, Enca

Abstract

Stem cell therapy offers a promising approach to the regeneration of damaged vascular and cardiac tissue after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This has resulted in multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) worldwide.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 21%
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Bachelor 33 18%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 10 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 10%
Engineering 8 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 11 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,521,387
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,502
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,918
of 250,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.