↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011320.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Armstrong, Priya Bhide, Vanessa Jordan, Allan Pacey, Jane Marjoribanks, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 49 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 58 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#482,491
of 21,446,675 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#959
of 12,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,988
of 288,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,446,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.