Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Sarah Armstrong, Priya Bhide, Vanessa Jordan, Allan Pacey, Jane Marjoribanks, Cindy Farquhar
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||16||94%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||27||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||17||9%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||14||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||46||26%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||15||8%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||14||8%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||4||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 351,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.