↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001724.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Needleman, Helen V Worthington, Elaine Giedrys-Leeper, Richard Tucker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 21 12%
Student > Master 17 10%
Unspecified 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 55 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 34%
Unspecified 14 8%
Philosophy 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 60 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,572,330
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,057
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,524
of 350,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#176
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.