↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001724.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Needleman, Helen V Worthington, Elaine Giedrys-Leeper, Richard Tucker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 12%
Unspecified 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 35%
Unspecified 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 50 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,372,291
of 15,147,785 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,795
of 11,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,344
of 264,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,147,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.