↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic use for irreversible pulpitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
91 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic use for irreversible pulpitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004969.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anirudha Agnihotry, Wendy Thompson, Zbys Fedorowicz, Esther J van Zuuren, Julie Sprakel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 56 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 60 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2021.
All research outputs
#437,552
of 18,938,127 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#920
of 11,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,029
of 279,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,938,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.