↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008092.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne Cheng, Gudula Kirtschig, Susan Cooper, Martin Thornhill, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Ruth Murphy

Abstract

Erosive lichen planus (ELP) affecting mucosal surfaces is a chronic autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology. It is often more painful and debilitating than the non-erosive types of lichen planus. Treatment is difficult and aimed at palliation rather than cure. Several topical and systemic agents have been used with varying results.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 260 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 73 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Psychology 15 6%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 80 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,313,974
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,167
of 12,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,709
of 253,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.