The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012628.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine Waldron, June Nunn, Caoimhin Mac Giolla Phadraig, Catherine Comiskey, Suzanne Guerin, Maria Theresa van Harten, Erica Donnelly‐Swift, Mike J Clarke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 6 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 6% |
Colombia | 3 | 4% |
Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 3% |
Peru | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 33 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 41 | 59% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 29% |
Scientists | 6 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 545 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 63 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 58 | 11% |
Researcher | 33 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 6% |
Other | 102 | 19% |
Unknown | 229 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 169 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 8% |
Unspecified | 14 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
Other | 54 | 10% |
Unknown | 241 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#729,979
of 26,438,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,277
of 13,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,291
of 367,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,438,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.