↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lithium for acute mania

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
64 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Lithium for acute mania
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004048.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca F McKnight, Saïk J.G.N. de La Motte de Broöns de Vauvert, Edward Chesney, Ben H Amit, John Geddes, Andrea Cipriani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 272 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 82 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Psychology 20 7%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 96 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#705,978
of 19,460,399 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,652
of 11,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,430
of 282,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,460,399 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.