| Title |
Lithium for acute mania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004048.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca F McKnight, Saïk J.G.N. de La Motte de Broöns de Vauvert, Edward Chesney, Ben H Amit, John Geddes, Andrea Cipriani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 25% |
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| France | 6 | 10% |
| Japan | 4 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Scientists | 7 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 425 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 10% |
| Researcher | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 16% |
| Unknown | 178 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 8% |
| Psychology | 20 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 45 | 11% |
| Unknown | 195 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,015,313
of 24,958,301 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,088
of 13,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,461
of 355,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,958,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.