↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003004.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon R Lewis, Andrew R Butler, Andrew Brammar, Amanda Nicholson, Andrew F Smith

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 388 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Researcher 34 9%
Other 30 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Other 82 21%
Unknown 124 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 11%
Psychology 9 2%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 139 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,367,620
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,651
of 13,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,513
of 315,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.