↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
35 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009593.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J Horne, Mikashmi Kohli, Jerry S Zifodya, Ian Schiller, Nandini Dendukuri, Deanna Tollefson, Samuel G Schumacher, Eleanor A Ochodo, Madhukar Pai, Karen R Steingart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 73 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 80 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#586,693
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,046
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,668
of 369,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.