↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
210 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
599 Mendeley
Title
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012292.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter von Philipsborn, Jan M Stratil, Jacob Burns, Laura K Busert, Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Stephanie Polus, Christina Holzapfel, Hans Hauner, Eva Rehfuess

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 210 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 599 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 598 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 110 18%
Student > Bachelor 92 15%
Researcher 63 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 7%
Student > Postgraduate 33 6%
Other 97 16%
Unknown 161 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 110 18%
Social Sciences 34 6%
Psychology 25 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 4%
Other 79 13%
Unknown 197 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 356. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2021.
All research outputs
#54,040
of 18,908,606 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 11,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,155
of 280,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,908,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.