↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter‐related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter‐related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004680.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htay Htay, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Francesco Paolo Schena, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Allison Tong, Yeoungjee Cho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 12 7%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 76 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 81 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,791,339
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,846
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,312
of 364,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.