↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter-related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter-related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004680.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htay, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Francesco Paolo Schena, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Allison Tong, Yeoungjee Cho

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 8 6%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 55 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 60 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,544,847
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,518
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,670
of 350,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.