↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter-related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Catheter type, placement and insertion techniques for preventing catheter-related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004680.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htay, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Francesco Paolo Schena, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Allison Tong, Yeoungjee Cho

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Decision Sciences 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 30 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,102,468
of 17,930,534 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,817
of 11,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,545
of 277,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,930,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.