↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects of different drugs and delivery devices on growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects of different drugs and delivery devices on growth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010126.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inge Axelsson, Estelle Naumburg, Sílvio OM Prietsch, Linjie Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 45 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 50 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#617,412
of 17,781,901 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,510
of 11,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,366
of 276,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,781,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.