↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Timing of prophylactic uterotonics for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Timing of prophylactic uterotonics for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006173.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hora Soltani, David R Hutchon, Thomas A Poulose

Abstract

Administration of the uterotonic drugs is one of the main components of the active management of the third stage of labour. The timing of uterotonics varies considerably across the globe and it may have significant implications on the well-being of the mothers and their babies.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Psychology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 39 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,484,634
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,838
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,668
of 94,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.