↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Timing of prophylactic uterotonics for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Timing of prophylactic uterotonics for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006173.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hora Soltani, David R Hutchon, Thomas A Poulose

Abstract

Administration of the uterotonic drugs is one of the main components of the active management of the third stage of labour. The timing of uterotonics varies considerably across the globe and it may have significant implications on the well-being of the mothers and their babies.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Psychology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 32 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,726,445
of 19,191,572 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,287
of 11,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,024
of 134,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,191,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.