↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional interventions for preventing stunting in children (birth to 59 months) living in urban slums in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
486 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional interventions for preventing stunting in children (birth to 59 months) living in urban slums in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011695.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie M Goudet, Barry A Bogin, Nyovani J Madise, Paula L Griffiths

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 486 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 18%
Researcher 65 13%
Student > Bachelor 63 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 7%
Other 24 5%
Other 100 21%
Unknown 113 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 99 20%
Social Sciences 33 7%
Psychology 19 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 3%
Other 84 17%
Unknown 131 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#442,516
of 17,373,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,009
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,739
of 272,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,373,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.