↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional interventions for preventing stunting in children (birth to 59 months) living in urban slums in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1401 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional interventions for preventing stunting in children (birth to 59 months) living in urban slums in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011695.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie M Goudet, Barry A Bogin, Nyovani J Madise, Paula L Griffiths

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1401 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 159 11%
Student > Bachelor 130 9%
Researcher 96 7%
Lecturer 92 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 5%
Other 215 15%
Unknown 634 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 207 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 199 14%
Social Sciences 65 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 2%
Psychology 32 2%
Other 195 14%
Unknown 669 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#773,644
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,371
of 13,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,421
of 370,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.