↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
548 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlene J Treanor, Olinda Santin, Gillian Prue, Helen Coleman, Chris R Cardwell, Peter O'Halloran, Michael Donnelly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 548 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 546 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 12%
Student > Bachelor 52 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 9%
Researcher 46 8%
Student > Postgraduate 26 5%
Other 97 18%
Unknown 214 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 15%
Psychology 63 11%
Social Sciences 23 4%
Unspecified 11 2%
Other 56 10%
Unknown 231 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,349,967
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,884
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,133
of 367,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.