The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlene J Treanor, Olinda Santin, Gillian Prue, Helen Coleman, Chris R Cardwell, Peter O'Halloran, Michael Donnelly |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 577 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 575 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 9% |
| Researcher | 47 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 94 | 16% |
| Unknown | 239 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 85 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 15% |
| Psychology | 63 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 10% |
| Unknown | 255 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,419,600
of 26,383,299 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,838
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,658
of 370,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.