↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlene J Treanor, Olinda Santin, Gillian Prue, Helen Coleman, Chris R Cardwell, Peter O'Halloran, Michael Donnelly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 286 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 75 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 18%
Psychology 35 12%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 90 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#861,001
of 17,805,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,209
of 11,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,811
of 274,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,805,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.