Title |
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000941.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G Justus Hofmeyr, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Cynthia Pileggi |
Abstract |
Misoprostol (Cytotec, Searle) is a prostaglandin E1 analogue widely used for off-label indications such as induction of abortion and of labour. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 2 | 50% |
Sweden | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 380 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 49 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
Researcher | 46 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 8% |
Other | 75 | 19% |
Unknown | 105 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 184 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 5% |
Psychology | 12 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
Other | 31 | 8% |
Unknown | 114 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,751,934
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,997
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,344
of 100,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.