↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007644.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Dempsey, Jan Miletin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 19 17%
Other 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 21%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 23 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#803,994
of 17,373,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,065
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,528
of 269,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,373,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.