↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007644.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Dempsey, Jan Miletin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 23 12%
Other 20 10%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 69 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 78 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,641,563
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,475
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,570
of 367,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.