↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
82 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
489 Mendeley
Title
A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013135.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Rivas, Carol Vigurs, Jacqui Cameron, Lucia Yeo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 489 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 489 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 19%
Researcher 67 14%
Student > Bachelor 62 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 7%
Other 80 16%
Unknown 116 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 17%
Psychology 71 15%
Social Sciences 43 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 132 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#428,327
of 17,948,621 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#937
of 11,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,807
of 271,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,948,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.