↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003195.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glazener CM, Lapitan MC, Glazener, Cathryn MA, Lapitan, Marie Carmela M

Abstract

Urodynamic tests are used to investigate people who have urinary incontinence or other urinary symptoms in order to make a definitive objective diagnosis. The aim is to help to select the treatment most likely to be successful. The investigations are invasive and time consuming.

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,764
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,904
of 245,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#178
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.