↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fortification of wheat and maize flour with folic acid for population health outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
Fortification of wheat and maize flour with folic acid for population health outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012150.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Centeno Tablante, Helena Pachón, Heather M Guetterman, Julia L Finkelstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 252 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 17%
Student > Master 41 16%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Other 16 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 65 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 19%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 73 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#424,089
of 17,373,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#945
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,029
of 269,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,373,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.