↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dilute versus full-strength formula in exclusively formula-fed preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Dilute versus full-strength formula in exclusively formula-fed preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007263.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fauziah Basuki, Diah R Hadiati, Tari Turner, Steve McDonald, Mohammad Hakimi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 19%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 30 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,100,174
of 17,773,620 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,836
of 11,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,878
of 271,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,773,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.