| Title |
Dilute versus full-strength formula in exclusively formula-fed preterm or low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007263.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fauziah Basuki, Diah R Hadiati, Tari Turner, Steve McDonald, Mohammad Hakimi |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 28% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 6% |
| Honduras | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 74 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 86 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,646,410
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,760
of 12,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,923
of 352,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.