↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Caffeine for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
367 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Caffeine for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001112.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma J Welsh, Anna Bara, Elizabeth Barley, Christopher J Cates

Abstract

Caffeine has a variety of pharmacological effects; it is a weak bronchodilator and it also reduces respiratory muscle fatigue. It is chemically related to the drug theophylline which is used to treat asthma. It has been suggested that caffeine may reduce asthma symptoms and interest has been expressed in its potential role as an asthma treatment. A number of studies have explored the effects of caffeine in asthma, this is the first review to systematically examine and summarise the evidence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 367 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 267 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 20%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Other 17 6%
Researcher 13 5%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 99 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 104 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 390. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#79,944
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198
of 174,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.