↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for polycystic ovarian syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for polycystic ovarian syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007689.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chi Eung Danforn Lim, Rachel Wai Chung Ng, Nga Chong Lisa Cheng, George Shengxi Zhang, Hui Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 376 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Master 46 12%
Researcher 36 10%
Other 22 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 5%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 146 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 160 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,226,094
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,545
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,984
of 363,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.