| Title |
Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea for chronic cough in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008182.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurel Teoh, Mark Hurwitz, Jason P Acworth, Peter van Asperen, Anne B Chang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,594,029
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,041
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,384
of 109,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.