↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cot‐nursing versus incubator care for preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Cot‐nursing versus incubator care for preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003062.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter H Gray, Vicki Flenady

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 185 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 68 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 15%
Psychology 9 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 74 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,730
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,486
of 132,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.