↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012806.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Yemisi Takwoingi, Seau Tak Cheung, Paul Nathan, Rubeta N Matin, Naomi Chuchu, Sue Ann Chan, Alana Durack, Susan E Bayliss, Abha Gulati, Lopa Patel, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Manil Subesinghe, Zoe Traill, Jonathan J Deeks, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Other 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 47 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,541,776
of 16,380,257 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,157
of 11,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,530
of 266,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,380,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.