↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET‐CT for staging and re‐staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET‐CT for staging and re‐staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012806.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Yemisi Takwoingi, Seau Tak Cheung, Paul Nathan, Rubeta N Matin, Naomi Chuchu, Sue Ann Chan, Alana Durack, Susan E Bayliss, Abha Gulati, Lopa Patel, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Manil Subesinghe, Zoe Traill, Jonathan J Deeks, Hywel C Williams, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 341 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Master 41 12%
Other 29 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 117 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 10%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 134 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,074,738
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,237
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,681
of 366,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.