The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008286.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsay F Stead, Priya Koilpillai, Thomas R Fanshawe, Tim Lancaster |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Finland | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 882 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 874 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 124 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 109 | 12% |
| Researcher | 91 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 6% |
| Other | 166 | 19% |
| Unknown | 259 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 263 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 96 | 11% |
| Psychology | 74 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 100 | 11% |
| Unknown | 290 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#217,078
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#357
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,679
of 316,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.