↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Singing as an adjunct therapy for children and adults with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
Singing as an adjunct therapy for children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008036.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Yoon Irons, Peter Petocz, Dianna Theadora Kenny, Anne B Chang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 252 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 18%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 86 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 14%
Psychology 19 8%
Sports and Recreations 11 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 96 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,370,865
of 22,562,129 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,912
of 12,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,793
of 284,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,562,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.