| Title |
Orthotic devices for the treatment of tennis elbow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter AA Struijs, Nynke Smidt, H Arola, C N van Dijk, Rachelle Buchbinder, Willem JJ Assendelft |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,094,202
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,675
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,032
of 124,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.