| Title |
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001911.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah J Nevitt, Anthony G Marson, Catrin Tudur Smith |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 78% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 217 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 66 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 80 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,377,991
of 24,248,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,122
of 12,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,003
of 350,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,248,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.