↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001911.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J Nevitt, Anthony G Marson, Catrin Tudur Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Master 25 12%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 73 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 84 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,613,358
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,196
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,230
of 360,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.